Sunday, August 17, 2008

SundayBreaker: Senseless

Most of you probably remember the name Willie Horton (pictured, left).

He was the convicted felon serving a life term in a Massachusetts prison for a vicious murder (the stabbing of a gas station clerk). He was allowed to leave prison for a weekend as part of a state enacted furlough program, instituted before Michael Dukakis took over as Governor.

Horton was released and never returned. While on the lam, he broke into a suburban home and waited for the family to return. He then beat and tied up the husband and repeatedly raped his wife. Dukakis, despite having little to do with his release (aside from being the Governor at the time and committing career suicide by favoring the furlough program), lost the 1988 Presidential Election in a landslide. Horton went on to become a symbol of the dark side of the Liberal, rehabilitative vision of the American prison system.

During the past two weeks in Southeast Texas, we've seen three murders, all allegedly committed by ex-cons. Former prisoners that -- while each spending significant time in jail -- had little in common with a murderous monster like Horton.

Brothers Gerald and Kelly Evans were gunned down in their North End Beaumont neighborhood by accused killer Batiste Breaux Jr. According to what has been reported, Breaux's criminal past is fairly straightforward.
Breaux was paroled from state prison in March on a 2002 burglary charge. He had received 12 years for burglary after his probation was revoked, according to court documents. Violent crime did not -- until now -- appear to be part of his dossier.

In the sad case of Summer Bourque, she was seen leaving a Port Arthur watering hole with Jimmy Joseph Desormeaux. Desormeaux, like Breaux, had no almost violent crime -- except for an aggravated assault charge -- in his past. He was convicted -- and served a prison sentence -- in Georgia for a drunk driving parole violation and was arrested multiple times for other driving crimes and theft. An apparent drifter, he had a number of run-ins with the law during his travels. But his background does not suggest the kind of violence that would lead to the senseless murder of a young woman.

In all three instances, there does not yet appear to be any real motive.

But the end result is still remarkably frustrating and sad: three young people are dead. They were allegedly killed by men who were once incarcerated, but no longer under the watchful eye of the prison system. Men who had almost no violent crime in their past until after they were released from jail.

While Horton was already a highly violent and lethal criminal, Breaux and Desormeaux were not. Do we then make the assumption that the prison system bears some of the blame for what happened here? Did it, perhaps, harden these former law breakers? That argument has been used by many who seek to reform current methods of prisoner incarceration for low risk inmates, giving them more of a chance at some sort of rehabilitation.

Or, as is more likely the case, are these events simply random and unexplainable? There are hundreds of questions surrounding these sad crimes and very few answers. The most salient is the one the families must be asking.

Why?

And our hope for them is that they find the answers and the justice they deserve.

30 comments:

  1. I have very little tolerance for those who knowingly break laws, particularly for violent crimes. We do need to provide some rehabilitation programs in our prison systems, but the inmates selected to participate in them should be carefully screened to determine their suitability for such programs. An intense application process could weed out some who would not take such programs seriously (which would be a significant waste of taxpayer money).

    Our current parole guidelines need some work because they simply "DO NOT WORK" in many cases. Prisoners who spend significant amounts of time behind bars definitely need a support system when released back into society. Also, I believe that a criminal should serve the FULL TIME they are sentenced for in a court of law......none of this "life in prison with the possibility of parole in 20 years for good behavior" business for me. I understand the high costs associated with maintaining our rapidly growing prison population, but that's a price that I, as a taxpayer, am willing to pay to keep myself, my family, and my friends safer out there.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If you shook my family tree, the ground would be littered with addicts. I have lived most of my half a century with someone struggling with--or not struggling with--active addiction. I believe to the core of me that addiction is a disease. I believe every bit as strongly that people should be held accountable for their actions. Period. Marijuana being illegal is not the problem. People who choose not to abide by the law is the problem.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am confused how this article jumped from prisoners in the prison systems to drug addicts to legalizing marijuana?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, KAK! The Lord works in mysterious ways.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I find it hard to RE-habilitate most of these people when most of them were habilitated from the beginning. You can't make them better if they didn't know better in the beginning.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Correction:

    I find it hard to RE-habilitate most of these people when most of them were (correction: not) habilitated from the beginning. You can't make them better if they didn't know better in the beginning.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Some of our citizens simply enjoy killing their fellow citizens.

    It makes more sense to start fighting crime in kindergarden rather than just before they hit the slammer. Up front, we know the kinds of environment that creates our crazies and misfits.

    Drive around Port Arthur's apartment complexes as view the next couple generations of misfit criminals.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes these murders were senseless. But in the case of Summer Bourque, I can't help but be a little bit upset that she left a bar with such a loser. I have read many comments that she was a sweet, caring, and trusting person. I just wish she had used better judgement that evening. She obviously left a bar with a man capable of murder.

    I am in no way saying this was her fault. Her killer needs to be found, shot, thrown in jail, beaten to an inch of his life, then taken in Huntsville.

    Surely a "man" of this "caliber" showed some signs of being creepy. I hope other young women will be less trusting and more skeptical.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "According to what has been reported, Breaux's criminal past is fairly straightforward. He was in prison on a burglary charge, serving 12 years after his parole was revoked. Violent crime did not -- until now -- appear to be part of his dossier."



    Good Lord. Didn't you read the Enterprise story?

    Breaux, born in 1982, was convicted for a burgulary he committed in 2002, at age 20.

    His intial sentence for 5 years PROBATION was apparently revoked in June 2004 after he commited two misdemeanors in March of that year, one for resisting arrest and the other FAMILY ASSAULT in which he allegedly poured and threw gasoline on a household member. Both misdemeanor charges were dropped and Mr. Breaux was sent to prison to serve a 12 year sentence.

    Obviously he was released 4 years later in March 2008 and ALLEGEDLY commited these two murders of the Evans brothers 5 months later.

    Obviously, Mr. Breaux had violent tendencies before he entered the Texas Prison System.


    Gotta get your facts straight.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Oh, please forgive me for failing to note this earlier:

    setx girl stated on another post

    "...I believe that repeat sex offenders should be castrated and locked away in self-sustaining concentration camps..."

    Now she says we need to rehablilitation programs for "carefully selected" inmates. I guess that automatically excludes sex offenders.

    What do you do about repeat female sex offenders like that babe in Florida? Female castration?

    By the way, girl, ignorance of breaking the law is not considered an excuse for breaking the law in a court of law. I would guess all criminals are well aware of the fact they are breaking the law...they just don't give a damn.

    ReplyDelete
  11. At least one answer to murder is quick and public justice, aka public hangings. Justice delayed is justice denied. At the completion of the sentencing - take 'em out back and string 'em up. Western justice was swift and final. It should be today and it isn't. Maybe a firing squad is another quick answer. Lethal injection, however, is a private (closed door)method and hushed way of dealing with criminal punishment. Public execution serves as a deterrent in a very visible way AS IT SHOULD to those who would be inclined to commit the crime of murder.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The rumor mill has Summer with 3 other girls soliciting drugs. Breaux, the rumor goes, supplied drugs. For some reason, Summer left with Breaux.

    It was further speculated that she was paying for her drugs the old fashioned way --- i.e., the oldest professional way.

    Living in Port Arthur, as I do, this is the preferred way to finance one's habit.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Josey, Baby:

    Wild-West justice may have been "swift and final," but history is replete with innocents stretching ropes. There is speculation that probably as many innocents were executed as the guilty.

    If they can unlawfully drag any citizen out of his bed and execute him for whatever reason, they can also drag you out of yours and mead out the identical punishment ---- for whatever reason "they" choose.

    Don't worry, Jose! There is a little vigilante in each of us.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yeah, these amateur hookers think they can take the money and then refuse to perform what they accepted money to do.

    It maybe looks like she cheated the wrong john.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Not sure why "S" has a strong need to single me out repeatedly and to twist my comments and use them out of context, but repeat sex offenders are so prone to continue their behaviors, that I personally don't feel they can achieve the rehabilitation required to safely re-enter sociey without posing a threat to other innocent victims. One example of this is the Shasta and Dylan Groene abduction and murder by a man named Duncan in Idaho a few years ago Therefore, I consider it more valuable to target inmates for rehabilitation, who actually stand a chance of being successfully rehabilitated. Regarding sex offenders.....I referred to "repeat" sex offenders. Professionals in the field of psychology do have tools to help determine the extent to which a person MAY respond to therapy/treatment/rehabilitation. Nothing is going to work in 100% of cases, but it makes more sense than either trying to rehabilitate all inmates or failing to attempt to rehabilitate some of them.

    I'm glad "S" that you brought up female sex offenders because I believe they should also be held more accountable for their actions. It all goes back to the main point I have tried to state all along that we need harsher sentencing to attempt to deter more senseless crime. People who are unstable, unbalanced, or who as you accurately state, just don't care, are going to commit their crimes anyway. These people, who pose a repeated threat to society, should be sequestered away from the general population. All Americans are entitled to certain inalienable rights, but when you create a victim and violate the rights of others to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, I just think you should be expected to forfeit the rights you have deprived another person of. I never stated that ignorance of breaking a law is a valid excuse in a court of law. I know these people don't give a damn about others, so why do we have to bend over backwards to give a damn about them???? I simply want people to pay for the crimes they commit (aka...be held accountable for their actions).

    ReplyDelete
  16. Dearest SETEX:

    "S" is not "twisting your comments."

    He merely elaborates upon your volumuous, disjointed, wordy, cock-eyed, and bloodthirsty description of justice. Your perspective on human failure is not breaking new ground. Free yourself from the mundane, and focus your talents more plight of the human condition.

    And before I forget……

    Paragraphs are your friend! Your sentence structure is somewhat lacking in structure. Purpose yourself to make syntax your mortal companion.

    Remember that you are human. You have a mortal soul. Free yourself from hatred. God's children are apt to stray from the fold --- from time to time.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Grammarians, spellers, punctuators of the world unite!

    ReplyDelete
  18. Why are we not seeing more coverage of the West End murder/attempted suicide? What's that guy's background?

    ReplyDelete
  19. To Boot Hill Benny:
    Point taken. But, to allow a convicted criminal to die from cardiovascular disease in prison while waiting for the executioner to complete their task is unfair to the victim's family as well as the tax payers. Something needs to speed up the system where both the crime and the punishment for said crime to be carried out in the same decade. Twenty damn years is too long for everybody EXCEPT the perp. And, that is where justice is denied.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Thanks To The Jefferson County District Attorney Mr. Maness!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Hey, 7th grade English Teacher,

    This isn't an English class, but if you want to "warm-up" for the school year on my posts, go right ahead. I actually have excelleent writing skills, and I don't disagree with your "grading" -lol. I sometimes get aggravated too when I read comments. I was in a hurry and moved some things around without editing. Sorry.

    You are coming into this discussion a little late, so I know you may not understand why I have felt the need to be verbose in my comments. "S" has followed me over from another thread and bashed me for not being ultra-specific, so I got carried away.

    Hey "S", I'm not complaining. I have enjoyed your discussions. I just wish you would allow a little broader perspective on some topics. See ya'll on the next story, and I'll try to improve my posts.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Excellent Writers All-we should actually be debating Gator's disjointed linking of Willie Horton with the recent killings in Beaumont. It might be proper to at one point reference Horton, and mention that unlike him, these convicts did not have a violent past. Gator however gives Horton undue importance, then gets in some good ole' liberal-bashing. (Gator is a sly one, so it's subtle) Side Note: We do not remember Willie Horton because he represents the dark side of Liberalism. We remember him because that ad campaign ushered in the beginning of modern dirty conservative political television ad. Our shorthand for this now is of course "Swiftboating". It works because the liberal that's attacked is usually too principled to respond in kind with a similar dirty and untruthful ad. He also usually believes that the truth will eventually become known, and that such preposterous attacks on him could not possibly be believed by his supporters. He is right, but of course all that really matters are the swing voters in the swing states-a notoriously ignorant group of confused humans.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Robert what's the point of debating Mr. Blog Administrator's linking and thinking when the guy doesn't even bother to get a simple command of the facts by first reading the article written by his collegues OR looking up the said alleged killers on the County's website where he would have found one of them DOES HAVE A VIOLENT PAST.

    I mean he CAN'T EVEN DO THE MATH and acually thinks A 25 YEAR OLD MAN RECENTLY RELEASED FROM PRISON SERVED A 12 YEAR BURGULARY SENTENCE.


    Gee, that would have put Mr. Breaux in prison at 13 YEARS OLD.

    COMPLETE INCOMPETENCE.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Just because they have never been CONVICTED of a violent crime, does not mean they were not violent and did not commit violent crimes prior to being in prison. That just means they haven't been convicted. You don't even know if they have been arrested for violant crimes and released, charges dropped or simply got away with it.

    ReplyDelete
  25. You're right, Chris in SE Tx. Who knows what these guys are really capable of. We just have the information reported to us. The point here is does taking a low-risk inmate -- drunk driver, burglar, drug user/dealer -- and placing them, for an extended period of time, in the prison system with definitively violent offenders make these convicts worse? Age old question, no easy answer.

    ReplyDelete
  26. It comes down to this:
    "Don't hang out with trash".

    We are responsible for who we hang out with. It is OK to judge people, and actually it is stupid not to. Would you let a homeless stranger into your house? Some folks would, but most would not. That is because we make a decision about that person and "judge" that person to be possible trouble.

    Why Summer did not see SOMETHING wrong with this guy is beyond me. God gave us a brain, and He expects us to use it.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Gator,
    I think prison can make a low grade offender (drunk, whatever) worse. I think if they are mistreated and feel that society hates them and treats them as a sub-human, they will be full of rage at society when they get out. OTOH, they may also hate their prison stay so much, that they will try hard not to return.

    My idea for prisons would be something along the lines of mostly solitary confinemnt (safe) with guards treating the prisoners as human beings. If a prisoner treats guards like crap, you cut contact with him for a while, give him crappy food etc.

    I think this may produce a prison where prisoners wouldn't fear for their life and anal-virginity, would be tempted to join gangs for protection. They also wouldn't have any (fun) activities, making their stay hell.

    Just my $0.02.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I don't understand why Willie Horton had to be brought into this. Why did you choose that particular case for illustration?

    ReplyDelete
  29. Anon 2:17,
    Willie Horton was a way to illustrate the concept of recidivism. Taking readily available statistics from, let's say, a decade ago. Roughly 68% of ALL former prisoners were re-arrested for a felony or serious misdemeanor. Using that logic, it was almost guaranteed that Horton would commit another crime upon his release. But, Breaux and Desormeaux are different. They are non-violent criminals who -- after being placed inside -- are now suspects in murder investigations. But, with statistics telling us that almost two-thirds off ALL prisoners will be recaptured for a felony, we're trying to figure out why that is. Why these seemingly non-violent career criminals, turn into killers -- committing felonies -- like Horton. Is it the system's fault? Was Horton the ideal example? That's for all of you to judge (and it seems many of you have).

    ReplyDelete
  30. Desormeaux's first FELONY conviction was in 1985 for BURGULARIZING a vehicle when he was 21 years old.

    1989, he was arrested for THEFT a generator from A-1 Rental Service. Desormeaux used stolen identification to rent the generator and never returned it.

    1990 Desormeaux entered a plea agreement for a 15-year prison sentence. He was released in April 1991.

    In 1995, he pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor disorderly conduct in Florida.

    In 1996, he was convicted of evading police and driving while intoxicated.

    In 1997 until July 2001, Desormeaux incarcerated in Georgia convicted of AGGRAVATED BATTERY.

    He later violated probation and returned to state prison in 2006 and was released July 28, 2008.



    IT'S CALLED ESCALATION. I don't think it has anything to do with prison. These criminals just get bolder by the crime because prison is not a punishment for them.

    Drug use is probably responsible for most of it.

    By the way, I've not heard anything in the media that Ms. Bourque was murdered or that Mr. Desormeaux is a murderer.

    Let's not jump to conclusions.

    ReplyDelete

Please use your name or choose an identity. Just click on "NAME/URL" below, and enter whatever handle you choose ... except Anonymous. The Bayou discourages anybody named Anonymous and reserves the right to delete any comments from "Anonymous" for no good reason. So there.